We're Back!! - Philemon

THE STRUCTURE OF THE LETTER
Just like we use certain conventions when writing letters today, Paul followed the typical pattern of letter writing for his day. This included an introduction, body, and conclusion. Many of the formal elements of Paul’s letters were very similar to their secular counterparts. However, Paul altered these conventions to fit the nature of his communication – for example, instead of the traditional salutation of the day, the Roman equivalent of “Sincerely,” Paul used the phrase “The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ.” This was also a clever play on words, since the traditional closing was “Karitas” (joy / happiness) and Paul wrote “Karis” (peace). A subtle change, indicating Paul’s grounding in Christ.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

SLAVERY in Paul’s world was commonplace. Slaves probably represented between 25% and 50% of the Roman Empire’s population. It was so engrained in society that no one questioned slavery as an institution, even though there was some awareness of the inequity that existed. In the same way, we don’t question capitalism as an institution, even though we’re aware of the injustice it can cause. The only known community that did not practice slavery was the Essenes, who did so more as a matter of discipline than of moral objection – they also abstained from marriage and eating certain foods as a part of their discipline. In the same way that the Essenes would have never dreamed of condemning marriage as an institution, so they had nothing against slavery as such. People became slaves at birth (born to slave parents or exposed as infants), through capture (kidnapped by pirates or captured in war), or by selling themselves into slavery to pay debts. As a result, unlike slavery in North America or Egypt, Roman slavery represented more of a social class than an ethnic group. Many slaves were educated in order to be more useful to their masters, and if you walked by a slave on the street, you would likely be unable to tell them from an average citizen. While there are many parallels, it is important to distinguish ancient slavery from the horrible abuses of humanity practiced in more recent memory.

HOUSE CHURCHES in Early Christianity were the primary way that Christians gathered together. Extended families often lived together in one household, which, for the sake of family structure, as well as, in many cases, survival, was a major institution in the ancient world. Jewish synagogues, pagan mystery cults, and philosophical schools often gathered in houses as well. Usually, one fairly wealthy member of the community (whose house was large enough to host a gathering), donated the space, where, at appointed times, the community would gather for worship, prayer, teaching, and to receive the sacraments. This setting was especially important in areas where Christians were being persecuted, because it afforded them some anonymity and protection.

INTERESTING WORD PLAYS are used at a couple key points in Philemon. This fits with the overall character of the letter as a well crafted rhetorical argument. In verse 11, Paul refers to a change in Onesimus from “formely useless” to “useful”. In Greek, the name Onesimus (a common name for slaves) literally meant “useful.” Of double meaning here, however, is the fact that the words Paul uses here are achrestos and euchrestos, which would have been pronounced the same way as Christos (Christ). Therefore, this may also be a reference to Onesmius’ changed character before and after his baptism (alluded to in verse 10). Later, in verse 20, Paul also uses the word oninemi (to benefit or take joy in), the same root word from which Onesimus’ name comes.

REFLECTION QUESTIONS
• Philemon (and many of Paul’s letters) give us a model of Christian gratitude. Do you ever thank God for the people in your life? How do your prayers compare to Paul’s prayer for Philemon?


• Paul states that he could use his authority to get what he wants, but that he “would rather appeal to [Philemon] on the basis of love.” What do you take this to mean? Why does Paul approach the situation in this way? How does this inform current Lutheran conversations regarding “love of the neighbor”?


• Because of the rhetoric (use of persuasion) in this letter, most scholars agree that Paul leaves Philemon little choice in his actual action. Some scholars believe that this is manipulative and wrong, others point to an appropriate use of thoughtful reasoning. What do you think, and why?



• In verses 15-16, Paul speculates on a divine purpose in the disagreement (or even disobedience) between Philemon and Onesimus. Some people believe God causes every situation for a purpose. Others believe that God is at work within every situation to bring about good. Do you see a difference? Which do you think Paul is pointing to here? (See also Roman 8:28)